Wellington + 64 4 496 9990
Lower Hutt + 64 4 569 4873
Masterton + 64 6 370 6480

Articles and News

Email me when new posts are made to this blog
The Corporate Veil

By Gibson Sheat

The Corporate Veil

Section 15 of the Companies Act 1993 (“Act”) states that a company has a legal personality in its own right and is separate from its shareholders. This is a principle known as the Salomon principle, originating from the case of Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd. The Salomon principle provides that a company is essentially regarded as a legal person separate from its directors, shareholders, employees and agents. This means as a separate legal entity, a company can be sued in its own name and own assets separately from its shareholders.

The corporate veil is drawn from the Salomon principle which separates the rights and duties of the company from the rights and duties of the shareholders and directors. Essentially, the corporate veil is a metaphoric veil with the company on one side of it and its directors and shareholders on the other and liability does not pass through.

The corporate veil does not provide protection to its shareholders and directors for their personal conduct or allow companies to be used for sham transactions. Accordingly, the courts may lift or pierce the corporate veil.

The corporate veil and Salomon principle were applied in Lee v Lee’s Air Farming Ltd. The Court ruled that although Lee was the controlling shareholder, sole director and chief pilot of Lee’s Air Farming Ltd, he was also considered an employee of the company and thus the company was a separate legal entity, even though Lee’s Air Farming Ltd was essentially a ‘one-man entity’. This ruling created the opportunity for the corporate veil to be misused and has since been regulated against by imposing reckless trading provisions.

Lifting the corporate veil

The corporate veil can be lifted by the courts if its presence would create a substantial injustice. This is the process used to look behind the corporate façade and identify the true nature of a transaction.

The corporate veil may be lifted in a number of circumstances, for example where a subsidiary company is in liquidation in the context of a group of companies as illustrated in Steel & Tube Holdings Ltd v Lewis Holdings Ltd. The subsidiary company was placed into liquidation and the plaintiff sought the debt owed by the subsidiary from the group of companies rather than the subsidiary as a separate entity. The Court of Appeal agreed with this approach as the subsidiary was not run as a separate legal entity. Some of the factors the Court considered were that the directors of the subsidiary managed the subsidiary as officers of the parent company and did not hold separate board meetings for the subsidiary. Technically, the subsidiary was a separate legal entity but it was not managed as a separate entity. Accordingly, the Court lifted the corporate veil to pool the assets of the related companies. The courts may not always apply this approach to groups of companies but this case identifies the importance of ensuring each entity within a group of companies is managed as a separate legal entity.

Piercing the corporate veil

The Courts may pierce the corporate veil and remove the protection of the Salomon principle to prohibit fraud. This was evident in Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne where a managing director agreed not to engage with his former employer’s customers but proceeded to do so through a newly formed company. The courts pierced the corporate veil to reveal the sham transactions occurring behind the façade of the company.

Generally, the courts are reluctant to pierce the corporate veil to protect creditors in the absence of fraud. However, where reckless trading takes place by directors, s 135 of the Act allows for the veil to be pierced.

In the case of tax evasion or unauthorised tax avoidance, the courts may look past the Salomon principle, pierce the corporate veil and declare the company a sham.

The courts will only lift or pierce the veil where an inequitable situation may be occurring behind the corporate façade based on the facts of each case. The corporate veil is vital for the legitimate use of the corporate structure and the protection of shareholders and directors and thus, by its very existence, promotes the playing field for taking commercial risks. 
 

1 Comments

Your comments
ninjadeden says ...
eseorang.Jika Anda mulai mengatakan yang sebenarnya, Anda halink 5
distributor plat high tensile sm490ya
distributor plat kapal
distributor plat stainless ss304
distributor plat stainless ss310
distributor plat stainless ss316
distributor plat sumihard
distributor round bar besi aisi 440s45c
distributor round bar scm440
distributor steel rail
distributor steel sheet pile
jual astm a283 c
undangan pernikahan kalender
Jual besi hollow
Jual besi hollow
Toko besi siku
Toko pipa besi baja sch 40 sch 80
undangan pernikahan bentuk tas
Supplier Besi H beam
Agen Wiremesh Besi baja
Jual plat kapal besi baja
Pabrik besi beton master steel ms
Supplier besi hollow
Supplier besi hollow
Toko pipa besi baja sch 40 sch 80
Toko besi hollow
undangan pernikahan ada fotonya
Supplier Besi Beton
Toko Wiremesh Besi baja
Supplier plat kapal besi baja
Pabrik besi beton ksty
Toko besi hollow
Toko besi hollow
Toko Plat besi
Toko besi beton Sni Ulir Polos
undangan pernikahan aneh
www.sentrabesibaja.com
Jual Wiremesh Besi baja
Toko plat kapal besi baja
Pabrik besi beton krakatau steel
Agen besi hollow
Agen besi hollow
Toko besi h beam
Toko besi wf baja
undangan pernikahan amplop
Pabrik Welded Beam T beam King Queen Cross Castellated Beam
Harga Wiremesh Besi baja
Agen plat kapal besi baja
Pabrik besi beton jcac
Pabrik besi hollow
Pabrik besi hollow
Toko besi wf
Toko besi unp
undangan pernikahan batik
Pabrik Bondek Cor
Pabrik Wiremesh Besi baja
Pabrik plat kapal besi baja
Pabrik besi beton interworld steel is
Distributor pipa besi
Distributor pipa besi
Toko wiremesh
Toko besi siku
undangan pernikahan murah
Pabrik Atap Spandek Sni
Distributor Besi Siku Baja